Litigation & Trial
Thomas C. Bell
Partner
(303) 892-7472
E-mail

Sara P. Bellamy
Associate
(303) 892-7430
E-mail

Jonathon D. Bergman
Partner
(303) 892-7421
E-mail

William A. Bianco
Partner
(303) 892-7396
E-mail

Charles L. Casteel
Partner
(303) 892-7345
E-mail

Steven H. Denman
Of Counsel
(303) 892-7459
E-mail

Erin McAlpin Eiselein
Partner
(303) 892-7308
E-mail

Janette L. Ferguson
Partner
(303) 892-7486
E-mail

John A. Francis
Partner
(303) 892-7338
E-mail

Michael J. Gallagher
Partner
(303) 892-7355
E-mail

David R. Hammond
Partner
(303) 892-7323
E-mail

Dale R. Harris
Of Counsel
(303) 892-7330
E-mail

Robert H. Harry
Senior Of Counsel
(303) 892-7325
E-mail

Richard P. Holme
Partner
(303) 892-7340
E-mail

Thomas P. Johnson
Partner
(303) 892-7487
E-mail

Victoria V. Johnson
Partner
(303) 892-7307
E-mail

Kenzo  Kawanabe
Partner
(303) 892-7541
E-mail

Glen E. Keller
Senior of Counsel
(303) 892-7424
E-mail

Geoffrey  Klingsporn
Associate
(303) 892-7337
E-mail

Jordan  Lipp
Associate
(303) 892-7471
E-mail

Andrew M. Low
Partner
(303) 892-7327
E-mail

Tom  McNamara
Partner
(303) 892-7349
E-mail

Gale T. Miller
Partner
(303) 892-7368
E-mail

Kirk  Mueller
Of Counsel
(303) 892-7456
E-mail

Thomas S. Nichols
Senior Of Counsel
(303) 892-7387
E-mail

Brett C. Painter
Partner
(303) 892-7418
E-mail

Jeffrey R. Pilkington
Partner
(303) 892-7513
E-mail

Stephanie A. Ries
Associate
(303) 892-7447
E-mail

Janet A. Savage
Partner
(303) 892-7341
E-mail

Shannon Wells Stevenson
Associate
(303) 892-7328
E-mail

Elizabeth  Titus
Associate
(303) 892-7406
E-mail

Rudy E. Verner
Associate
(303) 892-7212
E-mail

Tom  Wagner
Associate
(303) 892-7408
E-mail

Andrea  Wang
Partner
(303) 892-7423
E-mail

Chad D. Williams
Partner
(303) 892-7474
E-mail

Gail L. Wurtzler
Partner
(303) 892-7405
E-mail

Case Study: Patent Infringement 

We brought a patent infringement suit on behalf of a patent holder.  The defendant counterclaimed for antitrust tying and misuse of patent, and defended on grounds of invalidity and noninfringement, on-sale bar, inequitable conduct and other defenses.  After a three week trial, the trial court ruled the patent was invalid.  The Federal Circuit reversed and the trial court then found no infringement, which ruling was also reversed by the Federal Circuit.  The trial court then awarded inadequate damages, and after a third reversal, the defendants agreed to an eight figure settlement.

next.gif

 

Related Expertise

Antitrust, Marketing & Distribution
Appeals
Class Action Litigation
Construction & Real Estate Litigation
Criminal Defense
Eminent Domain
Employment & Labor Law
Franchise
Health Care
Insurance Litigation
International Transactions & Litigation
Manufacturing Industry


Related Expertise

Antitrust, Marketing & Distribution
Appeals
Class Action Litigation
Construction & Real Estate Litigation
Criminal Defense
Eminent Domain
Employment & Labor Law
Franchise
Health Care
Insurance Litigation
International Transactions & Litigation
Manufacturing Industry


Read a Case Study

Telecommunications Company
CERCLA Contribution/Cost Recovery
Defense of Colorado NRD Case
New Mexico NRD Claims Dismissed
Coalbed Methane Ownership
Challenges to Right to Develop