This website uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the use of cookies. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Policy.

Wetlands & Water Quality

Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP has a long and broad history of involvement and a deep team of experienced practitioners in the water quality arena. Our lawyers have served clients for several decades in water quality-related matters ranging from permitting, rulemaking proceedings, administrative and judicial enforcement actions, private party litigation, remedial actions, and transactional matters.

Specifically, we have represented clients before the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) as both proponents and opponents or involved parties in rulemaking proceedings to set water quality standards, classify stream stretches, challenge permit terms, and other matters. We have also represented mineral developers and various other entities in WQCC rulemaking proceedings challenging or supporting various Colorado Water Quality Control Division proposals to set or amend water quality standards for various constituents, designate impaired streams under Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 303(d), issue or deny water quality discharge permits, grant variances from applicable standards or requirements, and similar matters.

Additionally, we have defended against federal and state enforcement actions under the “direct discharge” permit program, pretreatment “indirect discharge” program, and storm water management program and have represented clients in the negotiation of permits and compliance schedules under each of those programs. We have also reviewed and helped develop intergovernmental agreements regarding water quality or related matters for various municipalities. We also have extensive experience with federal permitting and enforcement matters under the CWA Section 404 Program governing discharges of fill material into wetlands and other federal jurisdictional waters. This experience also includes successfully obtaining approved jurisdictional determinations from the Army Corps of Engineers finding that a Section 404 permit is not required for a proposed project.

Related Attorneys

Andrea M. Bronson

Partner, Environmental Law & Litigation, Natural Resources, Water Law

Mave A. Gasaway

Partner, Environmental Law & Litigation, Clean Energy & Sustainability, Natural Resources, Toxic Tort Litigation, Federal Oil & Gas Leasing, Public Lands, Tribal Lands, Water Law, Endangered Species, NEPA, CERCLA & State Equivalent Programs, Environmental

Scott W. Hardt

Partner, Environmental Law & Litigation, Public Lands, Tribal Lands, Mining Acquisitions & Divestitures, Endangered Species, Natural Resources, NEPA, CERCLA & State Equivalent Programs

John R. Jacus

Partner, Air Quality & Regulatory Compliance, Clean Energy & Sustainability, Environmental Law & Litigation, Natural Resources, Federal Oil & Gas Leasing, Safety & Health, Brownfields Redevelopment, Tribal Lands, Midstream Services, Endangered Species, NEPA, CERCLA & State Equivalent Programs, Environmental

Laura J. Riese

Partner, Environmental Law & Litigation, Environmental, Natural Resources

Zach C. Miller

Senior of Counsel, Environmental Law & Litigation, Water Law, Natural Resources, Federal Oil & Gas Leasing, Tribal Lands, Endangered Species, NEPA, Public Lands, Environmental, Clean Energy & Sustainability

James Witwer

Of Counsel, Water Law, Public Lands, Natural Resources, Wetlands & Water Quality, Environmental

Michael Golz

Associate, Environmental Law & Litigation, CERCLA & State Equivalent Programs, Wetlands & Water Quality, Water Law, Clean Energy & Sustainability, Natural Resources, Mining